+34 858 166 019
Risk level: Low
Who is this? Spam, telemarketing or a legitimate call? Community reports in United States.
Number with prefix 858. Review community reports, risk and comments below before answering or blocking. Browse numbers with prefix 858
Limited information: they claim to be from the electricity provider, stating there is an incident and a penalty for contract termination, but they do not know the user's provider.
Likely purpose: Attempt to collect a fake penalty for an alleged incident.
Most common user complaints
- Te llaman de la comercializadora de la luz diciendo que tienes una incidencia y que te van a cobrar una penalización por desistimiento de contrato, estafa no piquein por qué no saben ni con que comercializadora estás.
AI analysis: anteayer
Information based on community reports and automated analysis. It may contain errors or be out of date, and is not legal advice or a verified accusation against the number's owner.
Operator information
- Country:
United States- Prefix:
- 858
- Type:
- Landline
- Province:
- Granada
- Community:
- Andalucía
Recent searches
Last 7 days
Community comments
1Te llaman de la comercializadora de la luz diciendo que tienes una incidencia y que te van a cobrar una penalización por desistimiento de contrato, estafa no piquein por qué no saben ni con que comercializadora estás.
Spam numbers with prefix 858
- +1 348 581 004 85Other1 report· last reported Jun 20, 2026
- +1 348 581 005 19Other1 report· last reported Jun 20, 2026
- +1 348 581 004 95Telemarketing1 report· last reported May 18, 2026
- +1 348 581 005 17Spam1 report· last reported May 18, 2026
Related numbers with prefix 858
- +1 348 581 006 39Other1 report· last reported Jun 20, 2026
- +1 348 581 006 91Other1 report· last reported Jun 20, 2026
- +1 348 581 006 55Telemarketing1 report· last reported May 18, 2026
- +1 348 581 012 33Telemarketing1 report· last reported May 18, 2026
Signal summary for +34 858 166 019
+34 858 166 019 belongs to the 858 prefix and is classified as Spam. This page combines no approved reports and 1 public comment to explain the risk level.
