+44 161 814 765 0
Risk level: High
Who is this? Spam, telemarketing or a legitimate call? Community reports in United Kingdom.
Number with prefix 161. Review community reports, risk and comments below before answering or blocking. Browse numbers with prefix 161
AI Analysis
Limited information: Multiple reports indicate potential scam related to road accidents, with tactics including hang-ups, delayed responses, and vague conversations. Linked to 'G M Solutions' and 'Nexbridge Communication' in comments.
Likely purpose: Scam related to road accidents, attempting to trick victims into disclosing information or engaging in a callback scam.
Most common user complaints
- road accident scam
- hang up and expect callback
- delayed response
- vague conversation
- multiple calls
AI analysis: 10 Jul 2026
Information based on community reports and automated analysis. It may contain errors or be out of date, and is not legal advice or a verified accusation against the number's owner.
Web research
The number +441618147650 appears to be a UK geographic line (Manchester area code 0161) with reports suggesting nuisance or harassment calls. Public facing sources show user generated warnings but limited definitive verification for the exact line owner.
View full report
The number +441618147650 appears to be a UK geographic line (Manchester area code 0161) with reports suggesting nuisance or harassment calls. Public facing sources show user generated warnings but limited definitive verification for the exact line owner. 1. Who/what: UK geographic number (0161) corresponding to Manchester; online listings often label it as a nuisance/harassment call, with no verified business name attached. 2. What people say: Reports on forums and call lookup sites describe it as an annoying or harassing call, with users advising caution. 3. Association with wrongdoing: Multiple entries categorize as unwanted calls; some sources flag potential telemarketing or scam attempts, though specifics are unverified for a definite scam. 4. Public exposure/leaks: Appears in public reverse lookup and spam report databases; commonly listed in public directories and scam databases. 5. Advisability of answering: Not advisable to answer; if contact is needed, verify through independent sources rather than calling back.
United Kingdom
Operator information
- Country:
United Kingdom- Prefix:
- +44
- Type:
- Other
- Operator:
- EE, O2, Vodafone, Three
Recent searches
Last 7 days
Community comments
10Been handed my file in regards to an accident but due to data protection can't disclose any information then hesitated after being questioned. Apparently from G M Solutions
Eight calls in two weeks. Many ring once and hang up, expecting you to call back. When you do answer a call quickly there's sometimes a delay in them answering, meaning they are multi calling at the same time. Over polite conversation never quite getting to what they want. Probably accident scammers.
This phone number is under nexbridge communication - complain here https://nexbridge.co.uk/nuisance-calls/ and tell off com. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-telecoms-and-internet/how-to-report-a-complaint/nuisance-calls-and-messages
Been called four times by this number. Have spoken to them twice. They say I have had a road accident in last 3 years. No I haven't. Asked them to remove my number. Still calling so now have blocked
This is a scam caller re Accident They expect you to call back when they hang up Should be reported and given a massive fine for time wasting and Nuisance
No message left. I don't know anyone in Manchester! Called it "you had a road accident in the last 3 years" No, I didn't. Told them to stop calling, they hung up. Blocked.
No message left. I don't know anyone in Manchester!
Called. Left no message so blocked them.
I've twice been called by this number in the past week - both times no answer on pickup.
Hung up 5 seconds after I answered and greeted the unknown caller.
Signal summary for +44 161 814 765 0
+44 161 814 765 0 belongs to the 161 prefix and is classified as Scam. This page combines no approved reports and 10 public comments to explain the risk level.
