+44 333 006 9950
Risk level: High
AI Analysis
Limited information: This UK number has been reported for impersonating EDF, a utility provider, to scam individuals. Users report receiving texts and calls claiming owed money to EDF, despite not being EDF customers.
Likely purpose: Scam: Impersonating a utility provider (EDF) to extort money
Most common user complaints
- impersonating EDF
- claiming owed money for gas/electricity despite not being a customer
AI analysis: 10 Jul 2026
Summarize this NoCall number with
Information based on community reports and automated analysis. It may contain errors or be out of date, and is not legal advice or a verified accusation against the number's owner.
United Kingdom
Operator information
- Country:
United Kingdom- Prefix:
- +44
- Type:
- Other
- Operator:
- EE, O2, Vodafone, Three
Recent searches
Last 7 days
Community comments
11another call from this number: Always at the same hours, and on top of that without leaving a message ugh!!
yesterday Telemarketing at its worst, to make it worse every single day ugh!!
Yesterday Same story every week and also every single day!!
again, Rings once and hangs up; also never saying a word smh!!
Again, Never leaves a message, to make it worse and nobody does anything…
Another call from this number: Pure harassment, and worst of all even after blocking
Persistent sales calls, and on top of that from other numbers too…
Another call from this number: Repeated nuisance calls, and on top of that always at the same time
Several texts from these scammers purporting to be EDF and now they've tried calling me. They use the bona fide EDF number but as we're not with EDF but a different utility provider it's clear they're just impersonating them, so blocked. Beware.
They said i owed money 4 edf. I dont even use edf! Total scam, blocked dem
they said i owed them £90 for gas! lol, i dont even use that much gas! total scam, blocked.
Signal summary for +44 333 006 9950
+44 333 006 9950 belongs to the 333 prefix and is classified as unclassified calls. This page combines no approved reports and 11 public comments to explain the risk level.
